Installing Xfce on Ubuntu will turn it into Xubuntu, won’t it? ARTICLES. Linux Mint MATE is consuming a very low usage of memory. October 07, 2020, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author, Your email address will not be published. The project only added user-friendliness as its goal around 2006. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Fortunately, Xfce compensates for this lack by running GNOME apps almost as well as GNOME itself. The main difference between Cinnamon and Mate is that Cinnamon is a free and open source desktop environment for X Window System derived from GNOME 3 while Mate is a desktop environment consisting of free and open source software that runs on Linux and most BSD Unix systems.. A desktop environment is an implementation of the desktop metaphor. LXDE is a minimalistic desktop environment, somewhat like Windows XP in look and feel. If it is less consistent and less current than modern desktop environments, it is still more consistent and less old-fashioned in appearance than Xfce. One or two dialogs, such as the Setting Editor might still seem formidable to less experienced users. The newfound popularity of the two desktops is explained largely by the fact that both are based on GNOME 2. For example, I still can’t change the mouse cursor colour consistently – it sometimes changes in certain apps, or won’t change at all. They consist of a desktop display, a panel and a launcher, and both are largely free of 3-D effects, the influence of mobile devices or any effort to innovate in any major design elements. Mate is a fork of GNOME 2, openly intended as an alternative for those dissatisfied with GNOME 3 and Ubuntu's Unity. Mate inherits GNOME 2's unimaginative set of panel applets that is chiefly a combination of basic widgets such as taskbars and system monitors. GetDevInfo 1.0.4 has been released with major improvements! Each is an obvious example of the type of interface that was introduced in the mid-1990s, and remained dominant until the last four years. It’s up to you to decide which one you would like to prefer. MATE is not Lightweight Desktop. Another example is the panel clocks. If you install the xfce4 package, you just get the Xfce desktop and some basic packages included in the Xfce desktop such as Thunar file manager. I am writing this on a 2011 notebook running Mint 20 Mate. Unfortunately, the same is far from true of KDE applications, which can take 15-20 seconds to open. It should be noted that Openbox is actually a window manager and must be used in conjunction with one of the desktop environments listed above. Mate can take full advantage of this ecosystem of applications. GNOME 2 was the thing to use at the time - clean, sleek and cool. One of the reasons that GNOME remains popular in one form or another is that, over the years, it has accumulated a web of applications that take advantage of GNOME's features. It consists of … Your email address will not be published. Xfce vs MATE. By contrast, Mate draws upon a decade of incremental development for GNOME 2. (Mate on Linux Mint Mate and Xfce on Linux Lite which is basically Xubuntu with less packages) Xfce feels more mature and configurable and I'm more used to it. When comparing Ubuntu MATE vs Linux Mint, the Slant community recommends Linux Mint for most people. Compared to the era of GNOME 2, Xfce is considered a lightweight alternative. The Raspberry Pi Drone Flies: see the first flights and followup! Xfce can also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager. It offers a desktop environment for every user. Xfce uses fewer resources, but this advantage begins to erode as you install and … Instead, for the first year of its existence, Xfce emphasized speed and a small footprint. Beberapa tahun yang lalu saya membuat spreadsheet yang … Before continuing with the comparison between the XFCE, the GNOME 3 and the KDE, it should be clear for experts that we can’t touch the MATE desktop as an option in the comparison. I've used both on a very old laptop and I can't say there's "visible" difference. Like Mate, Xfce generally lives up to its self-description. I was wondering if I could get a bit of speed improvement by using XFCE but you have saved me the effort. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. Saya mencoba menemukan Lingkungan Desktop yang terlihat dan bertindak seperti windows. At the same time, if Mate is faster than GNOME 3, it is less responsive than Xfce in every way imaginable, from start time to the speed with which windows open and shut. KDE: Solid, full-featured, polished. However, while Mate has the full traditional GNOME top-level menus of Applications, Places and System, Xfce defaults to Applications alone. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR IT MANAGEMENT NEWSLETTER, SEE ALL September 11, 2020, Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. I really do like that redglass pointer though. September 18, 2020, Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast], ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire, Long story short: Between MATE and Xfce, I'd choose Xfce. MATE comes with more features than Xfce. August 14, 2020, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle, For my tests, I used a couple of VMs on my laptop, giving each of them 1GB of RAM, and 1 of my slow CPU cores. MATE is a bit “sleeker” than Xfce. Get it now. Discussion. Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on GNOME. To give just one illustration, both have context menus from which you can add icons and change the desktop wallpaper. And while Xfce does include notifications, each one opens staggered down the desktop, creating a temporary clutter that Mate and other recent desktop environments have struggled to contain with varying degrees of success. In … Having spent several years consciously imitating it, Xfce also resembles GNOME 2, down to the wording of many menu items and dialog boxes. In configuration tools, Mate and Xfce have a rough parity -- a fact that is not immediately obvious because of differences in how the features are grouped and named. Required fields are marked *. Jawaban 1: Saya adalah pengguna windows. Occasionally, too, Xfce can be much more thorough than Mate. Few desktop environments have benefited from the recent diversity of interfaces more than Mate and Xfce. However, Xfce's context menu includes a link for opening a terminal, as well as a complete copy of the main menu -- tools that seem another legacy of Xfce's geeky past. The exception is the panel apps, the small bits of functionality that can do so much to customize a desktop. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while … Xfce vs. MATE. Linux Mint 20: Cinnamon VS Mate VS XFCE. I guess you can’t win them all. In fact, the Linux Mint community is continuously debating on which desktop environment is the best. Although both come from a similar tradition, the two are more than just equivalents. cinnamon vs mate vs kde vs xfce. November 10, 2020, FEATURE |  By Samuel Greengard, I also made sure to only open each app once, so there was no caching to create misleading results. As a result, both Mate and Xfce can be classified as traditional desktops. ... MATE is supposed to be just like Gnome 2 since Gnome 3 (current version of Gnome) is very different from Gnome 2. Reality, FEATURE |  By James Maguire, It is a very bare-bone, minimalist desktop environment. Probably neither will have all of them, unless you're very lucky. xfce: It used to be that XFCE was the compact more efficient window manager. MATE can be considered as the GNOME 2 desktop’s next incarnation, but it’s not mainly marketed to be a lightweight or fast desktop. Despite the introduction of user-friendliness as an equal goal, to this day Xfce tends to have a blocky, slightly awkward appearance. Again, with LXQt vs MATE, the primary different again comes down to Qt vs GTK+. However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. If you prefer Qt software and you want a lighter desktop, then LXQt is a no-brainer. Ok, i will use xfce then, i need fast startup :). What about when I … At any rate, that’s it from me for now, but I have quite a lot of different posts coming up soon, so stay tuned! Xfce, for example, allows you to shorten the length of panels, while Mate does not. For example, both have a classical menu, with sub-menus spilling out across the desktop. Selecting among these two is very difficult. Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative. level 1 In comparison, Xfce's native applications are few fewer and less impressive. What is the difference between xfce4 and xubuntu-desktop packages? Error Mania – Pedantic Programming Problems. Mate proclaims itself "the traditional desktop environment," and so far its developers have sought to do little else than to continue to make a popular desktop environment easily available. Nor has Xfce spent as much time as modern alternatives like Unity have in worrying about such details as rounded-corners or the width of scroll and slider bars. Many times, making a choice means deciding what matters to you. The main difference is that Mate opts for separate configuration applications, grouped in the top-level System menu under the Preferences and Administration sub-menus, while Xfce's Setting Manager (one of the few thoroughly modern interfaces in Xfce) consists of icons grouped into several categories. Ubuntu 10.04 to 20.04 comparison video released! Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. Sometimes, too, they share the same missing features, or perhaps the same assumptions, as when both allow you only to arrange desktop launchers automatically in columns from top to bottom. This comparison was just what I was looking for. MATE Desktop Environment is based on GNOME 2. September 25, 2020, Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future, FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle, September 05, 2020, The Critical Nature Of IBM's NLP (Natural Language Processing) Effort, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle, Xfce vs. MATE. XFCE vs other lightweight desktops Holy wars could be waged over XFCE vs LXDE vs MATE vs Openbox . This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. Now that you’ve learned about LXDE vs. XFCE, you should check out some of our other Desktop Environment reviews, like GNOME, KDE, MATE, and Pantheon, and learn more about XFCE and LXDE customization. So might the file manager's option to "Open Parents.". September 13, 2020, IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI, FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle, Out of the box, MATE has a few more bells and whistles than Xfce, but it's also a little less customizable. Linux Mint Xfce: This is by far the most stable and lightweight option. Contact Me | Licences | Privacy & Cookie Policy, If you wish to support me, feel free to donate, Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window). The rest of the things remain the same. I want to like MATE but little things always feel off in comparison to XFCE. You might find that it feels a little bit more put together. XFCE was more plain, offered a few compromises but was lightweight. August 07, 2020. However, if any general description of differences can be made, it is that Xfce tends to have a more minimalist feature set, while Mate has more options. Both menus, too, allow you to drag and drop items from the menu to the desktop. However, that was on a Pentium 3-based system, and on Ubuntu 10.04, which is now 8 years old :). These apps can only be described as functional at best, and as lacking anything extra at worst. Out of the box, MATE has a few more bells and whistles than Xfce, but it’s also a little less customizable. Unity, first released in 2010, is a GUI developed by Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu. In theory, GNOME apps probably run slower under Xfce, but because Xfce is generally faster, you are unlikely to notice the difference. I was pleasantly surprised by how fast MATE was, so the conclusion I come to here is that there has been a lot of optimizing code since the original fork from GNOME 2. Xfce is a lightweight 2D desktop environment designed for better performance on older hardware. However, despite their similarities, which one is likely to appeal to you depends on what you are looking for in an interface. Mate's is unique in offering settings for multiple locations and offering weather reports, while Xfce, inspired by the variety of clocks that GNOME 2 once offered, includes the choice of Analog, Binary, Digital, Fuzzy and LCD clocks. LXDE. Related: Linux Mint 19.3 Xfce Edition Review; How to Manage Your Running Processes with XFCE’s Task Manager I did this over VNC to avoid putting any extra load on the laptop and slowing it down. In addition, Xfce still shows signs of its more geeky past. GNOME 3 has changed and added a lot since then, the gap between Xfce and Gnome 2 seems to have been much smaller. November 05, 2020, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author, GNOME, Unity, KDE, MATE DE’s are suitable for the users who are using Linux for everyday tasks such as web-browsing, listening to music, watching videos, etc. Main Usage Desktop, Showcase for the MATE and Cinnamon desktops. This will probably be a fairly short post, because most of the detail is in the video. September 09, 2020, Anticipating The Coming Wave Of AI Enhanced PCs, FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle, Admittedly, Xfce's Midori Web browser shows some promise as a lightweight alternative, but many distributions do not even bother loading it by default -- including Xubuntu, which is probably Xfce's most widely used variation. Thanks! Trying to decide between Mate and Xfce as your Linux desktop? XFCE, LXQT don’t offer fancy animations and icons but they’re popular among developers. It reminds me very much of Linux distros of years past. Nor does Xfce come with a menu editor, the way that Mate does. This post is about Linux Mint MATE and XFCE, specifically about which is faster and uses less RAM. Copyright 2020 TechnologyAdvice All Rights Reserved. If you have definitely decided against GNOME 3 or Unity, then either Xfce or Mate will probably seem like an improvement. Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author, Linux Mint 19.3 to 20 upgrade process and demonstration. September 14, 2020, Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video], ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire, I will stick to Mate. Similarly, after years of being the third most popular desktop environment, Xfce has become one of the major alternatives. November 18, 2020, FEATURE |  By Guest Author, I suspect the reason is that MATE uses 3D acceleration more than XFCE (I think), and this laptop might not handle that particularly well. Linux can be customized to a great extent. By contrast, Xfce's home page summarizes the desktop environment as "fast and low on system resources, while still being visually appealing and user friendly." However, since then, it has been influential in making Linux Mint the distribution of choice among experienced users. October 16, 2020, FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey, It is designed to run on legacy hardware which requires a desktop environment that has minimal system requirements. I want to open LibreOffice in 1 freakin' second (I'm in Lubuntu 20.04 right now and it does that, but it's somewhat ugly). Admittedly, Xfce's collection includes many similar items but is enhanced by such useful options as the self-explanatory Directory Menu and Screenshot. I'm a little partial to MATE, being an Ubuntu user since Hoary. Linux Mint 20: Cinnamon VS Mate VS XFCE : Which one is SNAPPIER? Init-System Systemd. cinnamon vs mate vs kde vs xfce. Default Desktop Environment Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce. At times, choosing between Mate and Xfce is a matter of selecting between nuances. In other places, Xfce and Mate each have features that the other lacks. Linux Mint MATE. Mate's is unique in offering settings for multiple locations and offering weather reports, while Xfce, inspired by the variety of clocks that GNOME 2 once offered, includes the choice of Analog, Binary, Digital, Fuzzy and LCD clocks. Like Mate, Xfce is primarily for older hardware which many have issues with the demands of Cinnamon. Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. Thank you for this. On the other hand, if you admire efficiency and speed, don't mind the odd bit of residual geekiness, and either don't care about appearance or are willing to customize heavily, Xfce will probably be more to your taste. Moreover, while its file manager Thunar is clearly inspired by GNOME 2's Nautilus, Mate's Nautilus has more options for configuring how contents are displayed. October 23, 2020, The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media, FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle, This was done on the laptop to accentuate any differences in speed between the two versions. This is done on request by someone who watched my Linux Mint 19 MATE Review video from three months ago. Moving panel applets and locking them is much more of a hassle than the XFCE panel. Even a few years after that, Xfce hadn't completed the simple, user-friendly task of adding a desktop launcher. However, the aims of Mate and Xfce differ strongly, to judge from each project's home page. Such differences might matter immensely if you are a compulsive customizer, or not at all if you tend to accept your desktop environment the way you find it. Out of these three, Cinnamon and MATE are the most popular and widely recommended options. Occasionally, too, Xfce can be much more thorough than Mate. Official Supported Architectures i386, amd64. What kind of apps do you prefer? In this video, and the accompanying blog post, I test Linux Mint 19 MATE against the XFCE version to see which runs fastest and uses less RAM on my laptop. XFCE: Light, simple, efficient. I expected the MATE version to be almost universally slower, because my previous experience comparing GNOME 2 and XFCE on old computers was that XFCE was way faster. The Xfce and Mate desktops have a generic similarity. Unity. September 22, 2020, NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle, But these generalities are only part of the story. I just use it as it is really portable and i use it like a tablet really. MATE was initially developed for the users who were disappointed with the… The LXDE desktop environment was launched in 2006 and had its latest stable release 0.99.2 … Contrariwise, each includes the technically useless screen-saver, presumably in keeping with tradition and users' expectations. Go here to see the post associated with that video. Comment document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "abd1a18cedf2c450bc490011c4cb9bd8" );document.getElementById("d085c25021").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Your lightweight desktop Linux can be even easier. There may be individual features scattered through both desktop environments that influence your choice as well. Linux Mint 19 MATE vs XFCE: A speed and CPU usage comparison. Xfce vs. MATE. But, whatever the case, you might want to draw up a list of must-have features and see which one has the most of them. Thanks for the hard workds, really apreciate. From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional. October 29, 2020, Dell Technologies World: Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle, If you want the other two top-level menus, you have to add them via panel applets. September 25, 2020, FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey, Among the desktop environments, only KDE can compare. ? Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. They include a DVD burner, a mixer, an application finder, a calendar and a virtual terminal. DDRescue-GUI 2.1.1 and GetDevInfo 1.1.0 Released! TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace. Unfortunately, some of the GNOME 2 bugs still seem to be around. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. Broadly speaking, they share the same features. November 02, 2020, How Intel's Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle, It is fast, easy, and simple. Perhaps unsurprisingly, I was wrong, except that MATE took a LOT longer to boot up. Perhaps the MATE version starts more services by default. Very thorough investigation and very good work. When I say 'Xfce,' it’s a good bet you think about a lean, responsive Linux desktop environment that’s particularly light on system memory usage. Evidence of these priorities lingers even now in the interface's inconsistencies and the tendency towards buttons and lists in dialogs and configuration settings. In these circumstances, the question you should ask yourself is, "What can't I live without?". A year ago, Mate hadn't even reached general release. However, it does NOT come with several key packages built-in that I think many new users would expect. October 05, 2020, CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science, FEATURE |  By Guest Author, On the one hand, if you want a more modern desktop, with a complete collection of native applications, Mate will probably suit you better. Thanks! 1. However, despite their similarities, the two desktop environments have enough differences that you should try both for several weeks before deciding between them. DDRescue-GUI Windows bundle released!