Jul 21, 2015 - Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton - Cobbe portrait - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Rachel Wriothesley, Countess of Southampton as Fortune is a Neoclassical Oil on Canvas Painting created by Anthony van Dyck in 1630. Portraits By British Artists Cobbe Portr Showing him as an androgynous-looking young man, it is now known as the Cobbe portrait of Southampton. He's wearing a very beautiful and expensive Italian lace collar. suppositos cineri doloso. The Cobbe portrait is an early Jacobean panel painting of a gentleman which has been argued to be a life portrait of William Shakespeare. It is displayed at Hatchlands Park in Surrey, a National Trust property, and the portrait is so-called because of its ownership by Charles Cobbe, Church of Ireland (Anglican) Archbishop of Dublin (1686–1765). The subject of the portrait was unidentified for centuries after passing into the ownership of the Cobbe family some time in the early 18th century. The Cobbe portrait is an early Jacobean panel painting of a gentleman which has been argued to be a life portrait of William Shakespeare.It is displayed at Hatchlands Park in Surrey, a National Trust property, and the portrait is so-called because of its historical ownership by Archbishop Charles Cobbe (1686-1765). The Cobbe portrait. [18], Wells and his colleagues have responded to the criticisms, arguing that David Piper's original 1964 identification of the Janssen as Overbury was based on the misreading of an inventory. While I don't place a lot of credence in the validity of this technique in general, this instance highlights the similarities between the faces -- specifically as the author says: the eyes. [1] Many scholars dismiss this theory and have provided evidence to identify the portrait as one of Sir Thomas Overbury. ... 3rd Earl of Southampton, and “the tradition is claimed to date to within living memory of Shakespeare. The Cobbe portrait, along with other relevant material, will go on show to the public at The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust in Stratford-upon-Avon from 23 April, Shakespeare’s birthday, in an exhibition curated jointly by Mark Broch and Dr Paul Edmondson, Curator of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust. The Cobbe portrait, as the scholars now call it, shows a head-turner of a man. the figure between the engraving and the Janssen copy. It was presented publicly to the world in 2006, after spending many years in the possession of a family collection. nondum expiatis uncta cruoribus, Their claims, however, will cause controversy, especially since some experts doubt the Janssen portrait is Shakespeare. [9] If verified, the Cobbe portrait would become the second portrait of William Shakespeare possibly painted from life. The trust's director, Diana Owen, called it a "momentous, historical and fascinating event". The real identity of the sitter for the new 'Shakespeare' portrait", Randall L. B. McNeill, Horace: Image, Identity, and Audience, JHU Press, 2001, pp.128–9, Church of Ireland (Anglican) Archbishop of Dublin, Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton, "William Shakespeare portrait in Irish home painted from life, say experts", https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/5019141/William-Shakespeare-portrait-could-be-16th-century-courtier.html, Title page of the First Folio with Droeshout's engraved portrait of Shakespeare, Folger Shakespeare Library: Janssen portrait, "The only true painting of Shakespeare – probably", "Unique portrait from Shakespeare's life unveiled", "The Bard? Since the publicity surrounding it, the portrait has appeared on the covers of several books, and even inspired the Chinese author Zhang Yiyi to have a series of cosmetic surgeries to have his face transformed into that of Shakespeare. The portrait, named "The Cobbe Portrait of William Shakespeare," was painted in 1610 and shows the dramatist at the age of 42, six years before his death. the new portrait (illustrated in several color plates), together with another piece in the Cobbe collection - a portrait believed to be Shakespeare s patron, the earl of Southampton, as a young man - first brought to the publics attention in 2002* This leads to discussions by … [10] It was for many years believed to be of Sir Walter Raleigh, and it bears a label on the reverse to this effect. Historia. The Cobbe family inherited the painting from an ancestor who was married to the Earl of Southampton. [2] The portrait has been the centrepiece of two exhibitions dedicated to it: Shakespeare Found: a Life Portrait at the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, Stratford-upon-Avon, from April–October 2009 and The Changing Face of William Shakespeare at the Morgan Library and Museum, New York, from February–May 2011. painted above the sitter's head. A new exhibition of Elizabethan clothing and cross-dressing in Shakespeare opens at Shake- Henry, Earl of Oxenford, Henry, Earle of Southampton, Robert, Earl of Essex (1624). See Cobbe portrait for information about this work. "[22], Proposal of Stanley Wells and collaborators. Both the Cobbe portrait and the Janssen copy received alterations, in particular to the hairline. The claims regarding this portrait follow from research into another portrait in the Cobbe collection, also displayed at Hatchlands Park, which came to public attention in 2002 when the painting, which for three centuries had been identified as a portrait of a woman, "Lady Norton", was correctly identified as a portrait of a young man. Not all Shakespeare scholars are convinced the Cobbe portrait is an authentic likeness — or even that it depicts Shakespeare at all. But now, after an intense two months of research, Mr. Cobbe says he believes he has found the earliest extant portrait of Henry Wriothesley, Third Earl of Southampton… In 2002 a portrait in the Cobbe collection was identified as a portrait of the youthful Earl (see below), now known as the Cobbe portrait of Southampton. temporada 2014/2015 www.teatrelliure.cat 2 Montjuïc - 6 d’octubre Love for Shakespeare direcció Lluís Pasqual intèrprets Laura Conejero / Maria Hinojosa / Míriam Iscla / Maika Makovski / Laia In Horace's context they form part of a sentence meaning "beware the alliances of princes. This world famous picture is arguably the only portrait of Shakespeare to have been taken from life. En 2009, Stanley Wells y la Shakespeare Birthplace Trust presentan esta pintura, que pertenece a la familia Cobbe desde comienzos del siglo XVIII, como un posible retrato de Shakespeare hacia 1610. Cobbe was the second son of Thomas Cobbe, of Swarraton, Winchester, Receiver General for County Southampton, by his marriage to Veriana Chaloner. periculosae plenum opus aleae, Supporters of the Shakespeare identification reject the arguments for Overbury. The painting will be on display for several months before it is returned to the Cobbe family. An illustrated catalogue provides details of the painting and its provenance.[3]. The image is in the Public Domain, and tagged Portraits and Allegory. Called the "Cobbe Portrait" after its owner. Showing of Two Recently Identified Works: The "Cobbe Portrait" of Shakespeare and a Sixteenth-Century Painting of Shakespeare's Patron, the 3rd Earl of Southampton Debates about the real image of Shakespeare often get mired in complicated, art historical detail, but Professor Stanley Wells, one of the world's leading Shakespeare experts, announced in London he was 90% certain the portrait is that of the playwright. The sitter has always been unknown, although there was an erroneous thought that it might be Sir Walter Raleigh. principum amicitias et arma They also assert that the hairline was altered before 1630, because another copy of that date already showed the balding forehead. New research revealed yesterday contends that the only portrait of Shakespeare painted in his lifetime has been found. [13], Other experts are even more sceptical, and suggest that even the circumstantial evidence is weak. Jan 22, 2015 - Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton (1573-1624). In 2006, the National Portrait Gallery concluded that the so-called Chandos portrait was then the only existing portrait painted during the life of Shakespeare. Cobbe was the second son of Thomas Cobbe, of Swarraton, Winchester, Receiver General for County Southampton, by his marriage to Veriana Chaloner. They have left him pretty much as he is in the portrait, but changed his hairstyle and dressed him in a striped tee-shirt and a casual but traditional style of jacket. "The Cobbe portrait will show people a man who was of high social status," says Wells. In a review of the exhibition catalogue edited by Wells, Robert Bearman writes: "It is strongly argued that there is a striking resemblance between the newly discovered portrait (or, rather, a copy) and the Droeshout engraving of Shakespeare, and that the painting might itself have been used by Droeshout." Yesterday, the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust chose the grand Mayfair base of the English Speaking Union to unveil what they are convinced is the only authentic image of Shakespeare made from life. The Cobbe heraldic pelican, motto In Sanguine Vita, part of the family coat of arms.. Evidence uncovered by researchers at the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust led to the claim, presented in March 2009, that the portrait is of William Shakespeare and painted from life. The Earl was a great friend of Shakespeare's and was probably was the one who commissioned the portrait. [4], The claims about the portrait have also met with considerable scepticism from other Shakespeareans and art experts, including Shakespeare scholar David Scott Kastan, who has questioned the portrait's provenance, and Dr. Tarnya Cooper, curator of 16th-century portraits at the National Portrait Gallery, who believes that both the Cobbe and Janssen portraits represent Sir Thomas Overbury. Writing in The Times Literary Supplement Shakespeare biographer Katherine Duncan-Jones also favours the identification of the subject as Overbury: An authentic portrait of Sir Thomas Overbury (1581–1613) was bequeathed to the Bodleian Library in Oxford in 1740. This page was last edited on 25 November 2020, at 00:16. He contacted Wells, who, despite his initial doubt, arranged for the painting to undergo the rigorous scientific analysis that would determine its validity. In 2002, a portrait in the Cobbe collection was identified as a portrait of the youthful Earl. The Cobbe family came into possession of the painting through a cousin’s marriage to the great-granddaughter of Henry Wriothesley, the 3rd Earl of Southampton. They refer to ‘the alliances of Princes’ – perhaps to be taken as an allusion to the Earl of Essex’s rising of 1601 in which Southampton was closely involved and which led to Essex’s execution and Southampton’s imprisonment. The painting has been in the Cobbe family for centuries, through its marital link to Shakespeare's only literary patron, Henry Wriothesley, the 3rd Earl of Southampton. The portrait includes the Latin legend Principum amicitias! Both dedications were addressed to Henry Wriothesley, The Earl of … Cobbe portrait of Southampton. ... the third earl of Southampton … Both the Shakespeare portrait and the painting of the earl were inherited by Archbishop Charles Cobbe (1686-1765). She noted the opinion of Eberhard J. Nikitsch, a specialist in inscriptions, who said that the script of the painting's inscription was not commonly used in early 17th-century portraits, and that it must have been added later. This is speculated[20] to be a quotation from Horace's Odes, book 2, ode 1 (below), where the words are addressed to Asinius Pollio, who, among other things, was a poet and playwright. Also, the story of the painting - known as the Cobbe portrait - once again raises questions about Shakespeare's sexuality. The Cobbe Portrait. Stanley Wells, editor. That the painting looks more like a 26-year-old than a 46-year-old - Shakespeare's age when it was likely painted - may be down to the convention of the time when a painter should "polish out the wrinkles and increase the size of the pearls," according to Mark Broch, curator of the Cobbe collection. Mr Cobbe concluded that the Folger portrait, whose authenticity has been doubted for decades, was a copy of the one that had been in his family’s art collection since the mid-18th century. The link shows the face in the Cobbe portrait morphed into the face in the Droeshout engraving from the First Folio. [6] The removal of overpainting in 1988 had, in fact, revealed an earlier state with a much younger hairline. The Cobbe portrait is an unattributed panel painting of a 17th century gentleman. He was educated at Winchester College and Trinity College, Oxford.. Charles Cobbe's maternal grandfather James Chaloner was Governor of the Isle of Man from 1658 to 1660. Portrait paintings of William ShakespearePortrait paintings of men by titleCharles Cobbe. Pictures were added over the centuries, and the collection continues to grow. It is possible the Earl may have wanted a more flattering image. The Cobbe portrait of Southampton goes on display today at Hatchlands Park, East Clandon, Surrey (01483 222482), 2-5pm Sundays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and … The Cobbe portrait of Shakespeare is inscribed with the words Principum Amicitias, a quotation from an ode by Horace that was dedicated to a playwright. It has descended in the Cobbe collection for nearly three hundred years together with a portrait of his only literary patron, Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton, to whom it probably belonged. The Cobbe family is an Irish landed family.The family has a notable history, [1] and has produced several prominent Irish politicians, clergymen, writers, activists and soldiers, such as writer and social reformer Frances Power Cobbe, and General Sir Alexander Cobbe VC. The claims regarding this portrait follow from research into another portrait in the Cobbe collection, also displayed at Hatchlands Park, which came to public attention in 2002 when the painting, which for three centuries had been identified as a portrait of a woman, "Lady Norton", was correctly identified as a portrait of a young man. Media in category "Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton" The following 11 files are in this category, out of 11 total. Even experts at the gallery doubt its authenticity. Features such as a distinctive bushy hairline, and a slightly malformed left ear that may once have borne the weight of a jewelled earring, appear identical. ("The Friendships of Princes!") The Morgan Library & Museum Presents Exhibition Focusing on the Controversial Shakespeare Portrait Question Includes First U.S. The collection of Old Masters has its origins in the 18th century, when members of the Cobbe family collected a large number of Italian and Dutch paintings for the handsome villa near Dublin, Newbridge House. Research suggests painting is the only portrait from life, leading expert says, The painting now believed to be of William Shakespeare has hung on the walls of the Cobbe family for about 300 years. tractas et incedis per ignis [17], Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel wrote that the Cobbe portrait was not an authentic likeness of Shakespeare. Photograph: Oli Scarff/Getty Images. In deciding between the Cobbe original and one of its copies as a source for the engraving, Wells draws attention to a greater similarity in the shape of Heritage Images/Hulton Archive/Getty Images Matt Cossolotto sent this link from a fellow Oxfordian that he said could be shared "at will". Scientific testing has shown that the portrait is painted on a panel of English oak sometime after 1595; the form of the collar suggests a painting date of around 1610. The similarities between the two were obvious and Cobbe rang Wells immediately, setting in motion more than two years of extensive art historical, literary and scientific research. … the earliest known portrait of the third Earl of Southampton, Shakespeare’s patron and possible lover. Life. According to Stanley Wells[3] the portrait has been in the possession of the Cobbe family since the early 18th century and is most likely a portrait of Shakespeare. The portrait then returns to the Cobbe family, which inherited it when an ancestor married England's Earl of Southampton -- a friend of Shakespeare who likely commissioned its painting. Wells and Cobbe are writing a book on Southampton and Shakespeare. The fact that the word "friendships" appears in the accusative case in the inscription (rather than in the nominative, as one would expect if it were to stand alone), underscores the fact that the inscription was meant to allude to the passage in Horace 2.1. bellique causas et uitia et modos The coincidence of distinctive features, the extraordinarily long hair, the high forehead, the long nose terminating in a bulb and the slender upper lip with known portraits of Henry Wriothesley, … [8], Cobbe sought advice from the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust. Duncan-Jones, Katherine. In 2002 a portrait in the Cobbe collection was identified as a portrait of the youthful Earl. The Cobbe portrait is not a genuine likeness of William Shakespeare made from life Confirmed by four expert opinions ... First Minister of Elizabeth I (Hatfield House, c. 1600); and the third Earl of Southampton (Tower Portrait, Duke of Buccleuch Collection, after 1603). Cobbe portraitFile:Cobbe portrait 2009-03-09.jpgFile:Shakespeare 1610.jpgCommons policy The fact that this alternation was made, in part, to reverse an earlier alteration to the hairline in the Cobbe suggests to Wells that it was made independently, and that the Janssen copy may have been used as a source for the engraving in this aged state. After extensive infra-red and x-ray test analysis including growth-ring testing of the panel on which the portrait is painted, scientists have estimated that the panel is from around 1610. They also suggested that the "Janssen portrait" was a copy of the Cobbe portrait. [11][12] Wells said: The evidence that it represents Shakespeare and that it was done from life, though it is circumstantial, is in my view overwhelming. Alastair Laing of the National Trust wrote at the time that, "I am very happy indeed about the identification. [22] The portrait is the earliest extant oil portrait of the androgynous-looking youthful Earl to survive and shows him at the time that Shakespeare dedicated his long poems Venus and Adonis (1593) and The Rape of Lucrece (1594) to him. In the eighteenth century the Cobbe family … The Cobbe collection includes works handed down from the family of the third Earl of Southampton, Shakespeare's only known patron. The Earl of Southampton was a dashing aristocrat who was able to avoid a death sentence passed on him after he participated in a rebellion against Elizabeth I. Cobbe Portrait of Southampton.jpg 1,732 × 2,250; 2.6 MB Was he more than just good friends with the man who commissioned the painting, his patron the Earl of Southampton? It seems likely the Earl of Southampton commissioned the Cobbe portrait, emphasising once more his closeness to Shakespeare. Hatchlands Park, Surrey, UK. Its dramatic discovery will ignite a new debate about the playwright’s sexuality THROUGHOUT56-year-old Alec Cobbe’s childhood, and well into his middle age, the picture that had been in his family some 300 years had been consigned But even if it were, he said, the traditions of Elizabethan portraiture meant that it would be unwise to conclude that Shakespeare actually looked like the figure depicted in the portrait. Discovered in 2006, researchers at the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust claimed in 2009 that it is a painting of Shakespeare, painted from life. Except where otherwise specified, all written commentary is © 2016, Hugh Macrae Richmond The Cobbe Collection doesn’t stop with the musical instruments, there’s also a group of remarkable paintings to discover. The Cobbe portrait is displayed together with a youthful portrait of his only known literary patron, Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton, to whom the Bard dedicated his two great poems (Venus and Adonis and The Rape of Lucrece) and possibly some of the Sonnets. However, the state of the painting that Cobbe viewed was not the one that showed the greatest resemblance to the standard engraved Droeshout image of Shakespeare with a high, balding forehead. In April 2008, a rare portrait, believed to be of Southampton has been discovered using X-ray technology. Even the man's beautifully intricate lace collar, though not identical in pattern, shares overall design with "Cobbe", having square rather than rounded corners. [3] Although many details of the doublet and collar are eliminated in the engraving, the angle and length of the arms, the shape of the fabric at the shoulders, and the length of the torso, all show a greater resemblance in the Janssen. The claims regarding this portrait follow from research into another portrait in Alec Cobbe's collection, which came to public attention in 2002 when the painting, apparently depicting a young woman, was provisionally identified as a … As is detailed in the catalogue of the 2009 exhibition "Shakespeare Found", several other early copies of the Cobbe portrait have been located and no less than three of them have independent traditions as portraits of Shakespeare.[3]. In the exhibition catalogue the "Janssen portrait" was tentatively identified as a depiction of the courtier, poet and essayist Thomas Overbury. "[20] The word for "beware" (or danger[ous]) is not, however present in the inscription, so it literally translates as "friendships of Princes". The Cobbe portrait (1610), The Chandos portrait (early 1600s) and the Droeshout portrait (1622): three of the most prominent of the reputed portraits of William Shakespeare. англисче: The Cobbe Portrait of WillIam Shakespeare (1564-1616) title QS:P1476,en:"The Cobbe Portrait of WillIam Shakespeare (1564-1616) " label QS:Len,"The Cobbe Portrait of WillIam Shakespeare (1564-1616) " Over the years there have been many false alarms on images of Shakespeare, including the Chandos portrait in the National Portrait Gallery. "Shakespeare Unfound(ed)? He was educated at Winchester College and Trinity College, Oxford.. Charles Cobbe's maternal grandfather James Chaloner was Governor of the Isle of Man from 1658 to 1660. Shakespeare's age and date had also been added at some later time.